American households waste, on average, almost a third
of the food they acquire, according to economists, who say this wasted food has
an estimated aggregate value of $240 billion annually. Divided among the nearly
128.6 million U.S. households, this waste could be costing the average
household about $1,866 per year.
This inefficiency in the food economy has implications
for health, food security, food marketing and climate change, noted Edward
Jaenicke, professor of agricultural economics, College of Agricultural
Sciences, Penn State.
"Our findings are consistent with previous
studies, which have shown that 30% to 40% of the total food supply in the
United States goes uneaten -- and that means that resources used to produce the
uneaten food, including land, energy, water and labor, are wasted as
well," Jaenicke said. "But this study is the first to identify and
analyze the level of food waste for individual households, which has been
nearly impossible to estimate because comprehensive, current data on uneaten
food at the household level do not exist."
The researchers overcame this limitation by borrowing
methodology from the fields of production economics -- which models the
production function of transforming inputs into outputs -- and nutritional
science, by which a person's height, weight, gender and age can be used to
calculate metabolic energy requirements to maintain body weight.
In this novel approach, Jaenicke and Yang Yu, doctoral
candidate in agricultural, environmental and regional economics, analyzed data
primarily from 4,000 households that participated in the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey, known as
FoodAPS. Food-acquisition data from this survey were treated as the
"input."
FoodAPS also collected biological measures of
participants, enabling the researchers to apply formulas from nutritional
science to determine basal metabolic rates and calculate the energy required
for household members to maintain body weight, which is the "output."
The difference between the amount of food acquired and the amount needed to
maintain body weight represents the production inefficiency in the model, which
translates to uneaten, and therefore wasted, food.
"Based on our estimation, the average American
household wastes 31.9% of the food it acquires," Jaenicke said. "More
than two-thirds of households in our study have food-waste estimates of between
20% and 50%. However, even the least wasteful household wastes 8.7% of the food
it acquires."
In addition, demographic data collected as part of the
survey were used to analyze the differences in food waste among households with
a variety of characteristics.
For example, households with higher income generate
more waste, and those with healthier diets that include more perishable fruits
and vegetables also waste more food, according to the researchers, who reported
their findings in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
"It's possible that programs encouraging healthy
diets may unintentionally lead to more waste," Jaenicke said. "That
may be something to think about from a policy perspective -- how can we
fine-tune these programs to reduce potential waste."
Household types associated with less food waste
include those with greater food insecurity -- especially those that participate
in the federal SNAP food assistance program, previously known as "food
stamps" -- as well as those households with a larger number of members.
"People in larger households have more
meal-management options," Jaenicke explained. "More people means
leftover food is more likely to be eaten."
In addition, some grocery items are sold in sizes that
may influence waste, he said.
"A household of two may not eat an entire head of
cauliflower, so some could be wasted, whereas a larger household is more likely
to eat all of it, perhaps at a single meal."
Among other households with lower levels of waste are
those who use a shopping list when visiting the supermarket and those who must
travel farther to reach their primary grocery store.
"This suggests that planning and food management
are factors that influence the amount of wasted food," Jaenicke said.
Beyond the economic and nutritional implications,
reducing food waste could be a factor in minimizing the effects of climate
change. Previous studies have shown that throughout its life cycle, discarded
food is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers pointed
out.
"According to the U.N. Food and Agriculture
Organization, food waste is responsible for about 3.3 gigatons of greenhouse
gas annually, which would be, if regarded as a country, the third-largest
emitter of carbon after the U.S. and China," Jaenicke said.
The researchers suggested that this study can help
fill the need for comprehensive food-waste estimates at the household level
that can be generalized to a wide range of household groups.
"While the precise measurement of food waste is
important, it may be equally important to investigate further how
household-specific factors influence how much food is wasted," said
Jaenicke. "We hope our methodology provides a new lens through which to
analyze individual household food waste."
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's National
Institute of Food and Agriculture supported this work through its Agriculture
and Food Research Initiative.
No comments:
Post a Comment