If you're reading this over a cup of joe, you're likely a modern,
optimistic existentialist -- so says Jill Hernandez, author of one of 18
essays in the newly released book on the storied beverage,
Coffee, Philosophy for Everyone: Grounds for Debate.
The oft-coveted and controversial drink -- the subject of debate on
ethics, environment, economy and even virility -- has been on
philosophers' minds since the first seeds were consumed for their
energizing effect in Ethiopia centuries ago.
Today, the coffeehouse is an innocent commonplace establishment, but
when roasting began in the 15th century, the dark brew was sinful
imbibing seen as an alternative to beer, and an addictively good one.
"Why this Satan's drink is so delicious," exclaimed Pope Clement VII
upon his first sip. By the 17th century, public coffeehouses, or "penny
universities" as they were known in Britain, became popular meeting
places for activists planning the French Revolution and the Boston Tea
Party -- Voltaire, Johann Sebastian Bach and Sartre, among them, says
Mark Pendergrast in his essay, "Black Puddle Water or Panacea." Our
days' ambitions may seem paltry in comparison but many of us won't
tackle morning emails without a shot.
The nerd fodder continues into modern commerce with essays entitled
"More than 27 Cents a Day: The Direct Trade (R)evolution," which
examines fair-trade operations, and "Is Starbucks Really Better Than
Brand X?" Here, you'll learn barista jargon, the meaning behind acidity,
body and viscosity, and how the robusta bean differs from the arabica.
"Third wave" drinkers -- that is, Stumptown Coffee-goers -- will also be
happy to see coverage of counter coffee culture.
As for health, coffee has been linked positively -- as a possible
prevention of Parkinson's, liver cancer and type 2 diabetes (maybe
not-so-much with an extra dollop of sweet crema) -- and negatively -- as
a possible cause of indigestion, premature old age, and impotence. Yes,
virility from coffee is debatable, though it may work wonders for the
mind. But
The Guardian reporter Stuart Jeffries
says impotence may be "overstated."
There was a Women's Petition Against Coffee in 1674, cites Jeffries,
that prompted men to argue for the benefits of the drink, saying it
"makes the erection more Vigorous, the Ejaculation more full, adds
spiritualescency to the Sperme." Meaning, it "increases sperm motility,"
notes Jeffries. But like all good vices, there's much ground for
debate.